Saturday, 30 May 2015

The Bar and the Golden Rule


“Tell me what country allows you to have a 100 per cent banking licence, to allow foreigners to own 100 per cent in the telecom sector, to allow foreigners to own 100 per cent of the agricultural business? Only Cambodia.”

Commerce Minister Sun Chanthol, 8 October 2014, the Phnom Penh Post

“You [foreign investors] have a dollarized economy here; you’re able to repatriate your revenue; if you make money you can take it with you; you can basically have 100 percent foreign ownership; there are tax preferences here in Cambodia that are frankly better than in the region.”

US Ambassador William Todd, 8 July 2014, the Cambodia Daily


“During the [trade] presentations, I made a statement that when I come back to Cambodia I will need to talk to our prime minister to nominate Ambassador Todd to be our expert or an official on the CDC (Council for the Development of Cambodia)… He’s done such a great job making presentations…in terms of the investment opportunities in the country and I really appreciate that, ambassador. You’ve done such a tremendous job for us.”

Commerce Minister Sun Chanthol, 8 October 2014, the Phnom Penh Post


“When they [foreign lawyers] come to our country, they act as if the Bar never exists. They go straight and set up a legal consulting company with Ministry of Commerce and apply for business and legal consulting services from tax department... then immediately start to provide legal services, they do not even care about consulting with the Bar to see whether their business is legal or try to apply for registration with the Bar to see if the bar can accept it.”

Former Bar secretary-general and HBS LAW managing director Ly Tayseng, 5 May 2015, Campro Forum


“Their illegal practice [not registering with the Bar] has affected confidence and value of the legal profession, and damaged the interests of the public.”

Bar Association of the Kingdom of Cambodia, 8 December 2014 Statement



So, what can those 50 illegal foreign lawyers do – they are violating the local law by refusing to register with the Bar – that Bar’s members of almost 1,000 cannot? A fair bit, actually.

First, they come with monies foreign investors bring into the country. It is unlikely that the investors would fly in solo with millions of dollars without their own lawyers, or at least without lawyers they can trust, which immediately disqualifies local lawyers. Or the local lawyers would find it tough to secure the trust.

Second, the foreign investors and their lawyers must know how the Cambodian court system works. It does not necessarily require legal skill in a court of law that allows free flows of bribes. It is an open secret that money can buy the “right” connection that opens all doors – even those with rusty locks. And it does not need an Einstein brain to identify where the right connection is. Here some local lawyers may be of some use as long as they specialise in connection networks.

The Bar’s sudden urge to uphold the rule of law may carry little weight, if any. The hard sell of Cambodia as a place for foreign monies by Sun Chantol gives a distinct impression that nothing will be allowed to stand in the way. The cosy relationship between Sun Chantol and William Todd, who is outspoken in protecting the foreign lawyers’ interest, will throw the Bar’s rule of law rhetoric into Choeung Ek dumpsite. Why do the Ministry of Commerce and/or the tax department not refer those foreign lawyers who wish to set up legal services to the Bar? Don’t they know the Bar exists? Don’t they realise there are rules on practising laws in the country? Or, they simply don’t care about the rule of law as long as the money flows in.

Then, what can premier Hun Sen, who is a member of the Bar, do to force these foreigners to register? Very little, really. His livelihood is not connected to running any legal practices like other Bar members. The threat of bankruptcy that purportedly arises from the unregistered foreign lawyers does not stare him in the face. His sole interest is in the money foreigners bring in.

The Bar’s campaign to apply the registration rule for all is facing defeat; it has fallen on deaf ears. A consolation prize is that the Bar, which is a union for lawyers, is not alone in failing to uphold the rule of law. Other unions of workers and other victims of money have been there, and bitterly disappointed. The Bar’s concern for damages these illegal practices do to public interest is touching. However, it is about time they knew it is an illegal jungle out there. And those with the most money win.

Anyhow, it may be comforting to know the rule by law, or the golden rule – those who have the gold make the rules – does not discriminate whether workers are in factories or legal practices. 



Ung Bun Ang
30v15



Parthian Shot


It sounds like a fair court system that does not discriminate between the bright and not so bright of the Royal Academy for Judicial Professions (RAJP) graduates. When it is not so certain who should make more money as a judge or prosecutor, the Academy opts for the lottery to determine the future wealth of their graduates.

At least the lazy thinking is consistent with the golden rule that does not discriminate whether it is the Bar or other unions it runs over.  


“The reason we chose this [lottery] method is because we do not want to compel the one who is outstanding or weak to become a judge or a prosecutor; we leave it for luck to decide.”

RAJP president Chhorn Proloeung, 28 November 2014



Notice:

Pseng-Pseng will take a break in June and July. The next issue will appear on 30 July 2015. It may not deserve a break, but target issues do.




Should you wish to receive Pseng-Pseng on your screen as soon as it is released, subscribe to it at https://tinyletter.com/pseng-pseng

Pseng-Pseng is published on the tenth, twentieth, and thirtieth day of every month. Previous issues are archived at pseng-pseng.blogspot.com


Wednesday, 20 May 2015

The Bar’s Rule of Law


“We always respect the WTO commitments, but that doesn’t mean foreign lawyers can practice their profession here without respecting the laws of Cambodia. They are just required to be registered, like in other countries, and the U.S. Embassy should reconsider and do some…legal research. If it is necessary to take legal action, I will file a suit.”

BAKC (Bar Association of the Kingdom of Cambodia) president Bun Honn, 29 April 2015, the Cambodia Daily


“Cambodia has opened up its services sector per our WTO commitments but they [foreign lawyers] are still subject to domestic regulations. Opening up a service sector does not mean free and unregulated entry.”

Cambodian WTO lead negotiator Dr Sok Siphana, 3 May 2015, Campro Forum


“I note that a number of foreign advisors who are not even admitted to the Bar in their home countries or countries of origin, and do not have capacity to read Khmer legislative texts, are trying to mislead some government authorities, investors and the public here and there including their countrymen in Cambodia or at their home countries, that they are allowed to legally practice laws in Cambodia and solicit the engagement of their services in obvious disregard of Cambodian laws and the WTO provisions. [Sic]”

Former BAKC secretary-general and HBS LAW Managing Director Ly Tayseng, 5 May 2015, Campro Forum



The outcry for the rule of law, which is so common among blue-collar workers and victims of land grabbing, development, etc…, has spread to legal practitioners. It remains to be seen if the intelligentsia would do any better.

The BAKC, which is a union for lawyers, is convinced legal powers are on their side. The 1995 Law on the Bar Statutes empowers them to control the legal profession in the country. It is compulsory for all lawyers to register with the Bar before they can open up their shop. Architect of the Cambodia’s WTO membership Sok Siphana emphatically rejects a notion that WTO regulations can overshadow the local ones.

In their 8 Dec 2014 statement, the Bar extol the virtue of the rule of law, and seek to enforce their compulsory membership on some 50 or so foreign lawyers who have been practising their trade in Cambodia without the registration. And, the foreigners object.

They may have reasons for the objection. If professional contempt is one of them, then the Bar ought to look at themselves.

It is possible the Bar have failed to do enough for the legal profession to command respect. They have ignored the foreign lawyers registration for twenty years – long enough to convince anyone that the Bar has perpetually broken its own regulations and obligations. Now they preach the rule of law, after breeding a sentiment that if the Bar can break them, so can others.

The Bar’s actions to rein in the foreign lawyers seem feeble. They appear to beg the violators to register “as soon as possible” – without imposing any deadline, leaving an impression that time is on the violators’ side. Bun Honn says he will drag them to court only if necessary, without realising that breaking a law is all it needs to be necessary. He may not be confident the court will apply the rule of law, despite claims that some foreign lawyers are not even registered in their own country. The Bar is riddled with doubts.

Indeed, it may take the Bar another twenty years to complete the registration, which gives much comfort to those who would argue “Rome is not built in a day” for any procrastination.

Beneath this Bar’s sudden urge to enforce the rule of law, there may lie a hidden commercial agenda. It seems bankruptcy is staring some local lawyers in the face. A long-standing lawyer who vigorously advocates the registration for all has already declared he is not making any money, and prepared to shut down his firm and drive taxi in the West for a living. Will the registration of the foreign lawyers really make his firm profitable?

If the Bar’s rhetoric is driven by commercial interests of their members, it will be amazing how a competition from the 50 odd foreign lawyers can drive some local lawyers up the wall and out of business. What can those 50 do that Bar’s members of almost 1,000, which include big names like premier Hun Sen, cannot?


Ung Bun Ang
20v15



Parthian Shot

It is understandable why Hun Sen refuses to pay when he loses his bet on the fight between Mayweather and Pacquiao. After all, five grand is almost half of his declared income under the anti-corruption law.

However, if he reneges on a lousy five grand for a simple reason that he does not like the referees’ decision against his interest, what will he do if he loses the next election? Or, what will he do to the elections to make sure he wins?


“Now if we are talking about yesterday’s fight, I owe you [$5,000], but I will not pay.”

Premier Hun Sen, 5 May 2015, the Cambodia Daily





Should you wish to receive Pseng-Pseng on your screen as soon as it is released, subscribe to it at https://tinyletter.com/pseng-pseng

Pseng-Pseng is published on the tenth, twentieth, and thirtieth day of every month. Previous issues are archived at pseng-pseng.blogspot.com


Sunday, 10 May 2015

The Tale of the Fish, the Ants, and the Impunity


“​ ឥឡូវខ្ញុំកំពុងនៅធ្វើជានាយករដ្ឋមន្ដ្រី ទំាងអស់គ្នានៅជាមួយបាន។  ប៉ុន្ដែ ស្រាប់តែ ដល់ពេលណា មួយ ស្រាប់តែឯកឧត្ដមសមរង្ស៊ីធ្វើនាយករដ្ឋមន្ដ្រីម្ដង ឧទាហរណ៍ណា + (សើចទាំងអស់គ្នា)  ស្រាប់ ដល់ពេលហ្នឹងឯកឧត្ដមអត់ឲ្យខ្ញុំរស់នៅ ស្រាប់ទៅធ្វើបាបខ្ញុំ ដល់ធ្វើបាបខ្ញុំ ការកម្លំាងវ៉ៃបកត្រឡប់មកវិញ គឺធើឲ្យឯកឧត្ដមនៅមិនសុខដែរ។

នាយករដ្ឋមន្ដ្រីហ៊ុនសែន ថ្ងៃទី២៦ មេសា ២០១៥  វិទ្យុបារាំងអន្តរជាតិ


គឺយើងមិនមែនជាសត្វត្រីយើងមិនមែនជាសត្វស្រមោច យើងជា មនុស្ស យើងជាខ្មែរដូចគ្នា។

ប្រធានគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិ សមរង្ស៊ី  ថ្ងៃទី២៦ មេសា ២០១៥ វិទ្យុអាស៊ីសេរី


“អ្នកដែលដឹកនាំប្រទេសជំនួសអ្នកដែល ចាកចេញពីដំណែងក៏មិនត្រូវទៅរករឿង  មិនត្រូវទៅ សងសឹក  ហើយទៅគុំគួនអ្នកដែលគេកាន់ អំណាចពីមុនៗទេ។

ប្រធានគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិ សមរង្ស៊ី ថ្ងៃទី២៦ មេសា ២០១៥  វិទ្យុអាស៊ីសេរី


“អ្វី​ដែល​ខ្ញុំ​កត់​សម្គាល់ និទ្ទណ្ឌភាព​នៅ​កម្ពុជា ជាពិសេស​ក្នុង​បរិបទ​នៃ​ការ​ដឹក​នាំ​របស់​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​យើង​បច្ចុប្បន្ន  គឺ​មាន​ការ​កើន​ឡើង​ខ្លាំង​មែន​ទែន។ ដូច្នេះ ខ្ញុំ​មក​សិក្សា​បន្ថែម​នេះ គឺ​ដើម្បី​ជា​ចំណេះ​ដឹង​មួយ​សម្រាប់​ផ្សព្វផ្សាយ​បន្ត  ហើយ​ចូលរួម​លុប​បំបាត់​និទ្ទណ្ឌភាព​នៅ​កម្ពុជា នា​ពេល​ខាង​មុខ។”

យុវជន អៀប អូន  ថ្ងៃទី ខែឧសភា ឆ្នាំ២០១៥  វិទ្យុអាស៊ីសេរី


“If they [children of the rich and powerful allegedly committing crimes] have not been arrested, they need to be arrested. There is no need to report on whose son it is or which tycoon’s child. Do not mention it. They are equal in society and the law… This makes people comfortable.”

National Police Commissioner Neth Savoeun, 6 May 2015, The Cambodia Daily



The 8 May 2015 joint declaration by the party in government and the one out of government renounces a Cambodian proverb on retribution: “During a high tide, fish eats ants, when water recedes the ants eat the fish.” Both parties pledge there will be no retribution to prove the proverb wrong.

It sounds very reasonable – nobody could ever win in the cycle of retributions. As Mahatma Gandhi says, “An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind”. There is no need for all to be blind.

However, for decades the tide has remained high and the fish has been eating ants: land grabbing, deforestation, farm evictions, starving wages, etc… The issue is how much longer the fish will continue to enjoy the ants. Will the well-touted culture of dialogue stop the fish’s appetite there and then? Not likely. There is a high probability the ants would remain victims for some time even if the fish wanted to stop because the weak are an easy target.

According to premier Hun Sen, minority leader Sam Rainsy has offered him a law that would guarantee amnesty from prosecution for previous leaders after they step down from office, though Sam Rainsy says it is the premier who asks for it. Anyhow, Hun Sen says he rejects it.

It seems there are a number of possible reasons for the rejection. First, the premier may think his fish has not been eating the ants. He often claims he is not well-informed, and often pleads ignorance. Sam Rainsy has now offered to report accurately to him what is going on, which may help.

Second, the premier can ensure the tide will never recede with the help of his top generals – one of them self-proclaims to be a Hitler’s disciple – who are ready to shoot unarmed civilians. He warns they will rise up with arms against those who bother him after he leaves office.

Third, he may encourage his fish to eat the ants faster so that if the water must recede, then there will be no ants to revenge. It may not be too obvious to him that when the water recedes the fish will die, even without the ants, and reveal their true nature – being rotten.

Anyhow, while Hun Sen takes out insurance policies to ensure a continuous high tide, Sam Rainsy commits himself to impunity for all, arguing Cambodians are human, not fish or ants.

Hence, whether Hun Sen is in or out of power, impunity will continue to shine. At national leadership level, the impunity encourages non-accountability, giving leaders a free reign to do whatever with a veneer of national interests without any concern for repercussions. No wonder many kill to remain leaders.

On the ground level, the likes of General Neth Savoeun and student Iep Oun will continue to be frustrated that criminals get away with their crime, and victims remain victims without recourse. And the culture of dialogue, as it is configured, will unlikely give them any relief.


Ung Bun Ang
10v15


Parthian Shot

So, according to the National Assembly Committee 1 chairman Eng Chhai Eang, the good intention of environment minister Say Sam Al to solve a land grabbing problem in Koh Kong is not enough.

It seems the high officials Eng Chhai Eang refers to behind the land conflict are as powerful as, if not more than, the minister’s father Say Chhum who Hun Sen says will be the next president of the Senate.


រឿងហ្នឹង ខ្ញុំឃើញឯកឧត្ដមរដ្ឋមន្ដ្រី ( សាយ សំអាល់)ហ្នឹង  លោកមានសុឆន្ទ: ក្នុងការដោះស្រាយ។  ប៉ុន្ដែមានបញ្ហាស្មុគ្រស្មាញខ្លះដែលធ្វើឲ្យឯកឧត្ដមរដ្ឋមន្ដ្រីពិបាកធ្វើការ  គឺដោយសារមានមន្ដ្រីជាន់ ខ្ពស់ផ្សេងៗទៀត មានការលូកដៃលូកជើងនៅទីនោះ ដែល ធ្វើឲ្យឯកឧត្ដមរដ្ឋមន្ដ្រីដែលលោកមាន ឆន្ទ:ដោះស្រាយ ហ្នឹងជួបការលំបាក។

ប្រធានគណៈកម្មការទី១ រដ្ឋសភា អេងឆៃអ៊ាង  ថ្ងៃទី ៥ឧសភា ២០១៥  វិទ្យុបារាំងអន្ដរជាតិ

Should you wish to receive Pseng-Pseng on your screen as soon as it is released, subscribe to it at https://tinyletter.com/pseng-pseng


Pseng-Pseng is published on the tenth, twentieth, and thirtieth day of every month. Previous issues are archived at pseng-pseng.blogspot.com