“Now there are [people] using the religious sector – monks and Buddhism
– for political purposes. This is a very dangerous problem. This problem is
making Buddhism evaporate and this is very dangerous….. We need to find the
solution to solve this problem.”
Phnom Penh
governor Pa Socheatvong, 19 December 2013
“អង្គអនុសំវច្ឆរមហាសន្និបាតមន្ត្រីសង្ឍទូទាំងប្រទេសលើកទី ២០ បានសម្រេចគាំទ្រយ៉ាងពេញទំហឹងនូវបេក្ខភាពសម្តេចអគ្គមហាសេនាបតី
តេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន ជានាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី សម្រាប់អាណត្តិខាងមុខ និងអាណត្តិក្រោយៗទៀត ...”
សង្ឃប្រកាស
លេខ១០៤/១១ ស.ន.ក.ជ ចុះថ្ងៃទី២១ ខែធ្នូ ឆ្នាំ ២០១១
“But if the monks vote and take one side, there will be discrimination
in pagodas and we are afraid the monks will starve. In the past few months, the
contributions to Buddhism have decreased by $1 million. When Khmer New Year
comes, will [donations] continue to decrease or not? How about Pchum Ben next
year, are [donations] going to decrease again? If in one year there is a
decrease of $1 million, and this decrease happens two or three times, the monks
will starve.”
Phnom Penh
governor Pa Socheatvong, 19 December 2013
"...ទេ
ចុះមកឆ្កួតជាមួយនឹងអាត្មាម៉េច អាឆ្កួត មកឲ្យធ្វើអំពាវនាវម៉េច កុំមកនាំអញឆ្កួត
អញមិនឆ្កួតទេវើយ អញប្រាប់មិញហើយថា ច្បាប់ជារឿងរបស់ខ្លួនឯងទេ កុំនាំអញឆ្កួត
អញមិនឆ្កួតជាមួយពួកអាជំគួតអស់ហ្នឹងទេ។"
The Great Supreme
Patriarch Tep Vong, 17 December 2013
“Don’t
come to beg from them [the government]. They have no rice for you. They only
have dog shit for you.”
The Great Supreme
Patriarch Tep Vong, 17 December 2013
Pa
Socheatvong must be suffering from either ignorance or a simple case of selective
attention. Either way, his outburst on the use of monks and religion in
politics is remarkable and may be very revealing.
First,
it is indeed hard to see how Pa Socheatvong, or the CPP, can claim a moral high
ground when the top monk establishments in the country openly declare its
strong endorsement for Hun Sen candidacy in national elections.
Second,
the drop in contributions to monks Pa Socheatvong claims is most interesting,
unless he is lying to put pressure on monks supporting the demonstrations. It
is reasonable to assume since the CPP has a full control over the monk establishments,
the drop and the amount he refers are likely to be accurate.
It
is possible Pa Socheatvong is right when he claims the drop is attributable to
congregations being sick and tired of monks playing politics, or being used for
political gains.
He
ignores other possibilities, however. Given the congregations are made up of
decent people, it is likely that the public display of vulgarity by the top
monk has eventually got to them. The growing reluctant CPP supporters may see the
political stuff-up after the elections as an opportunity to stop, or reduce, funding
for monks’ SUVs and their layman lifestyle. Some would say even Tep Vong’s
claim that the government has only “dog shit” for the people is not exactly a
vote of confidence in the CPP either.
This
one million dollar drop in donations to pagodas within the few months must be significant,
and worries Pa Socheatvong sick. Why else does he speak of starving the monks?
Or he is just playing politics, and lies.
UBA
21xii13
No comments:
Post a Comment